UK authorities/Flickr, CC BY-NC-SA
Following her launch from detention in Iran, Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, held hostage since 2016, mentioned: “what occurred now ought to have occurred six years in the past”. She was referring to the truth that her launch had been secured similtaneously the British authorities paid Iran a debt it had owed because the first day of her detention – and had in reality owed because the Nineteen Seventies.
Zaghari-Ratcliffe was tragically used as a pawn on this decades-long dispute over nearly £400 million.
My analysis has explored the historical past of the Anglo-Iranian arms buying and selling relationship and has discovered that London continued to be a worldwide hub for Iran’s arms buying efforts even after the 1979 Iranian revolution. This is probably shocking given what we learn about Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s case. Received knowledge is that the UK didn’t observe by way of on arms offers with Iran on account of considerations over the politics and provocative actions of the brand new Iranian regime. These revelations from the archives make this narrative more durable to swallow.
A contentious tank deal
Iran was a significant buyer for British weapons within the Nineteen Seventies. Between 1971 and 1976, the Iranian authorities ordered 1,500 Chieftain tanks and 250 armoured restoration automobiles from Britain at a value of round £650 million. These orders – and the related funds – had been lodged with British state-owned arms firm International Military Services Ltd (IMS Ltd).
At the time, Iran was dramatically increasing its arms purchases, having cashed in on the 1973 oil disaster that noticed costs quadruple. The Shah of Iran – the monarch ruling the nation – was utilizing the proceeds to pursue home modernisation, together with by way of defence and arms procurement. Journalist Anthony Sampson described Iran within the mid-Nineteen Seventies as “the salesperson’s dream”. The nation spent over US$10 billion on tanks, plane, missiles and all method of weaponry between 1974 and 1976, and deliberate an extra US$10 billion spend by 1981.
The 1979 revolution that toppled the Shah noticed the US halt arms gross sales to Iran. The UK – no less than in some regard – adopted go well with. British tank transfers ceased and the majority of the Nineteen Seventies contract went unfulfilled. Only 185 of the Chieftain tanks ordered by the Shah had been delivered.
However, IMS Ltd held onto the Iranian authorities’s cash – ultimately mentioned to be round £400 million when curiosity is taken into consideration. A protracted sequence of authorized battles have been fought over these funds.
Zaghari-Ratcliffe was detained almost 4 many years later and, through the years, the hyperlink to the Nineteen Seventies tank debt has steadily emerged. Zaghari-Ratcliffe was first instructed that the connection was being drawn between her imprisonment and the debt by her Iranian interrogators in 2016. Meanwhile, the British authorities remained cagey and averted the query of a hyperlink. Now, nevertheless, it has formally confirmed that it paid the debt in the identical assertion asserting the discharge of Zaghari-Ratcliffe and fellow detainee Anoosheh Ashoori.
The post-revolution arms community
While Britain halted the switch of the Chieftain tanks when the Shah fell, the arms buying and selling relationship with Iran didn’t stop completely in the course of the Nineteen Eighties.
Indeed, by the point Iran was preventing a bloody conflict with Iraq that might final for a lot of the decade and declare as much as one million lives, Britain, and London specifically, had a central position in Iran’s arms procurement networks.
My analysis exhibits that Iran was operating a army procurement workplace within the coronary heart of Westminster to produce its conflict machine. The workplace, hosted within the National Iranian Oil Company constructing, was situated over the road from the Department for Trade and Industry, and a stone’s throw away from Westminster Abbey and the Houses of Parliament.
British authorities paperwork from 1985 word 60 to 70 arms sellers labored to dealer arms offers within the constructing alongside over 200 oil firm representatives. Contemporary press experiences urged thousands and thousands of {dollars} of enterprise flowed by way of the workplace, though British officers had been reluctant to specify how a lot of Iran’s alleged US$1.2 billion annual arms purchases had been dealt with in Westminster.
While few precise weapons programs seem to have been transferred by way of the workplaces, a search of the constructing in 1982 by the Metropolitan Police did uncover explosive fighter jet ejector seat components within the basement.
Some proof even suggests a hyperlink between IMS Ltd, the Chieftain tank deal and the Iranian workplaces. In the mid-Nineteen Eighties some spare components for the tanks had been equipped to Iran, with the identify of Iran’s London workplace discovered on some leaked paperwork linked to the transaction.
The official British guidelines on arms transfers to Iran and Iraq in the course of the conflict had been sophisticated. Guidelines from 1984 urged that Britain wouldn’t provide “deadly” gear, that current contracts must be fulfilled the place attainable and that transfers shouldn’t exacerbate or lengthen the battle.
British officers had been nicely conscious of the Iranian workplace, and had been continuously pressured to behave in opposition to it by the US authorities. However, British intelligence struggled to grasp what precisely was occurring contained in the constructing, and no clear proof may ever be discovered of a breach of British legislation.
The want to keep away from a diplomatic spat with Iran but additionally the potential for a flourishing business relationship with Iran in different areas –- notably supplying the National Iranian Oil Company – prevented British motion.
It was solely in 1987, following a sequence of Iranian provocations, together with assaults on oil tankers and British diplomats in Tehran, that Margaret Thatcher’s authorities pulled the plug on Iran’s arms dealing operations in Westminster.
Insights from the archives
It is obvious that difficult diplomatic relations and worldwide sanctions on Iran over current many years have made resolving the tank debt sophisticated. But the largely forgotten story of Iran’s London arms procurement workplace makes the British authorities’s unwillingness or incapacity to pay considerably difficult to grasp. Any narratives that urged it was unimaginable to have interaction with the query of the debt skip over reasonably numerous different actions that continued all through the interval in query.
I’ve been capable of scrape collectively details about Iran’s audacious Nineteen Eighties procurement operation on the coronary heart of Westminster due to the principles that make authorities data public after 30 years. In one other 30 years’ time, the archives would possibly assist to shed some additional mild on the occasions of 2022, in addition to the years Zaghari-Ratcliffe and Ashoori spent imprisoned. They would possibly inform us why it took so lengthy for them to be reunited with their households.
Daniel Salisbury receives funding from the Leverhulme Trust.
